Write less with AI, not more.

Less

AI makes it easy to produce long text, but length is rarely the challenge. Clarity is. Communicating an idea in many words is fast; expressing it in few words is slow, demanding, and revealing of true understanding. The real value of AI is not generating more content, but helping refine, edit, and distill ideas to their essence. Compression forces decisions about what truly matters and exposes weak thinking. Used well, AI becomes a tool for precision, respect for attention, and better thinking—doing the hard work of saying the right thing, clearly, in as few words as necessary.

More

The often-attributed quote, “I didn’t have time to write you a short letter, so I wrote you a long one,” captures a paradox at the heart of communication: verbosity is easy, precision is hard. To speak at length requires little discipline; to speak briefly requires thought, judgment, and care. In the age of artificial intelligence, this paradox becomes even more pronounced. AI can generate ten thousand words in seconds, yet the true value of intelligence—human or artificial—reveals itself not in abundance, but in restraint.

Modern AI systems are astonishingly good at what is quick and easy: producing text, expanding ideas, filling pages, and elaborating endlessly. Given a prompt, an AI can draft a long article, a detailed report, or a rambling explanation almost instantaneously. This mirrors a human tendency as well. When we are unsure of our ideas, we often compensate with volume. We explain from every angle, repeat ourselves in different words, and hope that somewhere in the mass of text, meaning will emerge. Length feels productive. It looks like effort. But it is often a substitute for clarity.

Communicating an idea in ten thousand words is rarely difficult. You can include every supporting argument, every anecdote, every qualification, and every exception. You can hide weak thinking behind density. Communicating the same idea in one hundred words, however, is an act of distillation. It forces you to decide what truly matters and what does not. It requires you to understand your own thinking well enough to strip it down to its essence. This is slow, demanding work, because it exposes confusion instead of concealing it.

This is where AI’s real potential lies—not as a generator of bulk content, but as a tool for refinement. Asking AI to produce more text is usually the least valuable thing you can do with it. The world is not short on words. It is short on clear, precise, meaningful communication. When we ask AI to summarize, edit, clarify, or compress our ideas, we are asking it to do the hard work that humans often avoid. We are using it not as a typewriter, but as a thinking partner.

Editing is an intellectual act. To edit well, you must recognize redundancy, identify weak arguments, and sense when a sentence adds noise rather than signal. Refinement requires taste. Clarification requires empathy for the reader—an understanding of what they need to know and what they can safely be spared. These are slow processes for humans because they require reflection and self-critique. AI, however, can perform multiple passes of editing without fatigue, emotional attachment, or ego. It does not mind cutting what you labored over. It does not resist simplification.

This shifts the role of the human. Instead of spending hours generating first drafts, humans can focus on forming ideas, asking better questions, and judging the results. The human contribution becomes less about producing text and more about setting direction: What is the core idea? Who is the audience? What is the desired outcome? These are not trivial questions, and AI cannot answer them on its own. But once they are answered, AI can help do the grinding work of compression and refinement at extraordinary speed.

There is also a deeper lesson here about thinking itself. Clear writing is not just a way of expressing thought; it is a way of creating it. When you force an idea into one hundred words, you discover whether you actually understand it. Vague thinking cannot survive severe constraints. Word limits act like intellectual pressure tests. They reveal leaks, inconsistencies, and empty claims. By using AI to help enforce these constraints, we can accelerate our own learning and understanding.

However, this requires a change in how we prompt and evaluate AI. If we reward it for being verbose, it will be verbose. If we reward it for being precise, it will learn to be precise. Asking “write more” is easy. Asking “make this clearer, shorter, and sharper without losing meaning” is harder—but far more valuable. The quality of AI output is strongly shaped by the quality of our demands. In this sense, prompting AI is itself a discipline of thought.

There is also an ethical and cultural dimension. We live in an attention-scarce world. Long, unfocused communication wastes not only time, but trust. When readers feel that their attention is not respected, they disengage. Using AI to reduce cognitive load—to say more with less—is not just efficient, it is considerate. Brevity, when done well, is a form of respect.

Of course, not everything should be reduced. Some ideas require space, nuance, and exploration. The point is not to fetishize shortness, but to value intentional length. A thousand words should exist because they are necessary, not because they are easy to produce. AI makes it tempting to inflate everything. Resisting that temptation is a mark of maturity in how we use the tool.

Ultimately, the promise of AI is not that it can talk endlessly, but that it can help us think better. Thinking better often means thinking smaller—finding the core, the spine, the single sentence that holds the rest together. When we ask AI to help us edit, refine, and clarify, we are asking it to do what is hard and slow for us, so that we can focus on what is hard and slow in a different way: deciding what we actually mean.

The future will not belong to those who can generate the most words. It will belong to those who can say the right thing, in the fewest words necessary, at the right moment. AI can help us get there—but only if we stop asking it to do what is easy, and start asking it to do what is difficult.